Coordination of COVID-19 pandemic response measures at the territorial level
Keywords:
COVID-19, public health measures, coordination, pandemic responseAbstract
SARS-CoV-2, the virus that triggered the COVID-19 pandemic, has caused approximately 20 million deaths and has created global chaos, highlighting the importance of effi cient coordination of public health measures to limit spread and reduce impact on healthcare systems and society. Th e study focused on analyzing existing literature using PubMed, ScienceDirect (Elsevier) and search engine Google Academic, considering sources published between 2020 and 2023. Studies have emphasized that early intervention, digital technology use for eff ective coordination, active community involvement, and effi cient collaboration among agencies are crucial in managing the COVID-19 pandemic. Relevant data analysis has shown that success in reducing the pandemic’s impact signifi cantly depends on citizens’ trust in their governments. For example, while South Korea managed the pandemic without severe restrictive measures, relying on trust in authorities, New Zealand adopted restrictive measures and eff ective strategies of clear and transparent communication to effi ciently respond to the pandemic’s evolution. In contrast, in regions like Mexico and Brazil, where pandemic management was characterized by defi ciencies and shortcomings, high levels of infection, mortality, and morbidity were recorded. Th ese comparisons underscore the importance of well-defi ned strategies in combating a global health crisis. Coordinated public health measures have been decisive in managing the spread of COVID-19. Th e research highlights the need for effective communication channels, fl exible strategies, and determined leadership to optimize public health responses in the context of future pandemics.
References
1. OECD. Strategic foresight for the COVID-19 crisis and beyond: Using futures thinking to design better public policies. Paris, France: OECD 2020. https://doi.org/10.1787/82129230-en
2. OECD/EUROPEAN UNION. Health at a Glance: Europe 2020: State of Health in the EU Cycle. Paris, France: OECD 2020. https://doi.org/10.1787/82129230-en
3. CYR A., MARTINEAU C., JOHNSON-OBASEKI S. et al. An Inconsistent Canadian Provincial and Territorial Response During the Early COVID-19 Pandemic. In: Front Public Health. 2021;9:708903. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.708903
4. OKUONZI S. Lessons for epidemic emergency policy: A review of the scope of Ebola and COVID-19 pandemics in Africa. In: Health. 2023;15(7):10. https://doi.org/10.4236/health.2023.157053
5. MINISTRY OF HEALTH NZ. COVID-19: Protecting Aotearoa New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Health NZ; 2020.
6. BAKER MG., WILSON N., ANGLEMYER A. Successful Elimination of Covid-19 Transmission in New Zealand. In: N Engl J Med. 2020;383(8). https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2025203
7. JEONG E., KIM J., CHOI J. et al. Understanding South Korea's Response to the COVID-19 Outbreak: A Real-Time Analysis. In: Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(24):9571. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249571
8. DIGHE A., CATTARINO L., CUOMO-DANNENBURG G. et al. Response to COVID-19 in South Korea and implications for lifting stringent interventions. In: BMC Med. 2020;18(1):321. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01791-8
9. SZYLOVEC A., DE SOUSA MASCARANHAS FERNANDES LMM., AMORIM M., AMBROGI I., FERNANDES LMM., PACHECO R. Brazil's Actions and Reactions in the Fight Against COVID-19 from January to March 2020. In: Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(2):555.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020555
10. ERIGATO S., FERNANDEZ M., AMORIM M., AMBROGI I., FERNANDES LMM., PACHECO R. The Brazilian Government's mistakes in responding to the COVID-19 pandemic. In: Lancet. 2020;396(10263):1636. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32164-4
11. SOTT MK., BENDER MS., DA SILVA BAUM K. Covid-19 Outbreak in Brazil: Health, Social, Political, and Economic Implications. In: Int J Health Serv. 2022;52(4):442-454. https://doi.org/10.1177/00207314221122658
12. IBARROLA-PEÑA JC., CAMPOS-NAVARRO R., PANDO-MORENO M. et al. Preventive measures against the COVID-19 pandemic in Mexico: A cross-sectional study. In: Front Public Health. 2022;10:932010. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.932010
13. GIANICOLO E., RICCETTI N., BLETTNER M., KARCH A. Epidemiological Measures in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic. In: Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2020;117(19):336-342. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2020.0336
14. GOLINELLI D., BOETTO E., CARULLO G. Adoption of Digital Technologies in Health Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Systematic Review of Early Scientific Literature. In: J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(11). https://doi.org/10.2196/22280
15. GHOSH A., NUNDY S., MALLICK TK. How India is dealing with COVID-19 pandemic. In: Sens Int. 2020;1:100021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sintl.2020.100021
16. BURKI T. COVID-19 in Latin America. In: Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(5):547-548. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30303-0
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



